Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung TL240, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TL240 (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TL240 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR III was released 8 years later than the TL240 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the GR III scores versus the TL240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung TL240
GR III | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | January 2010 | Fresher by 107 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh GR III
TL240 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL240
GR III | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III has got exterior measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the GR III vs the TL240.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and TL240 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and TL240.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR III because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will render more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern GR III provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung TL240 |
Also called | - | ST5000 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $900 | $171 |