Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320

Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
34
Features
36
Overall
34

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
  • Successor is Ricoh GR III
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as WB1000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TL320 (12MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TL320 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GR III was launched 9 years after the TL320 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GR III scores vs the TL320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung TL320

 GR III TL320 
ReleasedSeptember 2018February 2009More modern by 117 months
Display resolution1037k460kClearer display (+577k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GR III

 TL320 GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL320

 GR III TL320 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III comes with outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the GR III compared to the TL320.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and TL320 is 90 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and TL320.

All in all, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR III featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger GR III provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography details
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography details
80
has manual focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
33
you can focus manually
includes face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III Street photography details
Samsung TL320 Street photography details
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
includes touch to focus
lighter than others in class (257 grams)
above average ISO range (102,400)
no articulating screen
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III Sports photography information
Samsung TL320 Sports photography information
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
has phase detect autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography info
Samsung TL320 Travel photography info
69
lighter than others in class (257g)
includes touch to focus
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography info
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography info
69
has manual focus
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
does not have anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (102,400)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
43
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL320 as a Vlogging camera
37
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (257 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone socket
31
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung TL320
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR III Samsung TL320
Also called - WB1000
Category Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2018-09-25 2009-02-23
Body design Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 102400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-16 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing distance 6cm 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 257 gr (0.57 pounds) -
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $900 $380