Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
42
Overall
39

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Released September 2018
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F Overview

Here is a extensive comparison of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB150F, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB150F (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GR III was introduced 6 years later than the WB150F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the GR III grades versus the WB150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB150F

 GR III WB150F 
IntroducedSeptember 2018January 2012Fresher by 82 months
Screen resolution1037k460kClearer screen (+577k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh GR III

 WB150F GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB150F

 GR III WB150F 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III enjoys physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the GR III and the WB150F.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and WB150F is 90 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and WB150F.

As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Ricoh GR III will produce extra detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern GR III should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR III
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
81
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
saves RAW files
42
has manual focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Street photography camera
84
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
comes with focus via touch
lighter than others in class (257g)
very good ISO range (102,400)
fixed screen
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (188 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III Sports photography advice
Samsung WB150F Sports photography advice
76
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
fixed focal length (28mm)
51
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography features
Samsung WB150F Travel photography features
69
lighter than others in class (257g)
comes with focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average in class (188 grams)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
no Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography features
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography features
69
focusing manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
does not have anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (102,400)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no Time Lapse recording
49
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB150F as a Vlogging camera
37
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (257g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic port
32
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
lighter than average in class (188g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB150F
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung WB150F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR III Samsung WB150F
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2018-09-25 2012-01-09
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 102400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-16 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range 6cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 257g (0.57 lb) 188g (0.41 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $900 $230