Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung WB210 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
45
Overall
40

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Released September 2018
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB210, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB210 (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB210 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The GR III was launched 7 years later than the WB210 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GR III matches up against the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB210

 GR III WB210 
AnnouncedSeptember 2018July 2011Fresher by 88 months
Screen resolution1037k1kCrisper screen (+1036k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh GR III

 WB210 GR III 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB210

 GR III WB210 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the GR III and the WB210.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and WB210 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and WB210.

As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR III due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger GR III will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB210 Portrait photography advice
81
manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
supports RAW formats
39
focusing manually
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR III
Street photography with Samsung WB210
84
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
boasts touch focus
lighter than competition (257g)
very good ISO range (102,400)
no articulating screen
66
image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus via touch
lighter than competition (174g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Sports photography camera
76
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
38
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB210 Travel photography highlights
69
lighter than competition (257g)
boasts touch focus
resolution is good (24MP)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
lighter than competition (174 grams)
supports focus via touch
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography info
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography info
69
manual focus
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
no anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (102,400)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have Timelapse recording
46
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
very good size screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
manual mode not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III Vlogging details
Samsung WB210 Vlogging details
37
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (257g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competition (174g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB210 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB210
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung WB210
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR III Samsung WB210
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2018-09-25 2011-07-19
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 102400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-16 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 6cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3.5"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 1 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 257 grams (0.57 lbs) 174 grams (0.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) microSC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $900 $279