Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Introduced January 2014
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB2200F, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB2200F (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR III was introduced 4 years after the WB2200F which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the GR III grades against the WB2200F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB2200F
GR III | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | January 2014 | Newer by 58 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GR III
WB2200F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB2200F
GR III | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III enjoys outer dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the GR III compared to the WB2200F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and WB2200F is 90 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and WB2200F.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR III with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will render extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent GR III provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB2200F |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 708g (1.56 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $900 | $599 |