Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB250F, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB250F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR III was revealed 5 years after the WB250F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR III matches up vs the WB250F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB250F
GR III | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | January 2013 | Newer by 70 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GR III
WB250F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB250F
GR III | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III has got external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the GR III compared to the WB250F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB250F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and WB250F.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR III using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Ricoh GR III will offer greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern GR III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB250F |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $900 | $250 |