Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Released September 2018
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB250F, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB250F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR III was revealed 5 years after the WB250F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR III matches up vs the WB250F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB250F

 GR III WB250F 
LaunchedSeptember 2018January 2013Newer by 70 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Display resolution1037k460kCrisper display (+577k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GR III

 WB250F GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB250F

 GR III WB250F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III has got external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the GR III compared to the WB250F.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB250F is 90 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and WB250F.

As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR III using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Ricoh GR III will offer greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern GR III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography info
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography info
81
you can focus manually
good resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
supports RAW formats
36
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III Street photography details
Samsung WB250F Street photography details
84
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
boasts touch focus
lighter than others in class (257g)
great high ISO (102,400)
no moving screen
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (226 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III Sports photography factors
Samsung WB250F Sports photography factors
76
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
fixed focal length (28mm)
52
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography information
Samsung WB250F Travel photography information
69
lighter than others in class (257 grams)
boasts touch focus
good resolution (24 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average (226 grams)
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
no Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography highlights
69
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
great high ISO (102,400)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of Timelapse recording
44
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III Vlogging information
Samsung WB250F Vlogging information
37
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (257 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone support
35
decently wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (226 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB250F
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung WB250F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR III Samsung WB250F
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2018-09-25 2013-01-07
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 102400 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-16 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 6cm -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 16 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 257 grams (0.57 lbs) 226 grams (0.50 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $900 $250