Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- New Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB30F (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR III was released 5 years later than the WB30F and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GR III scores versus the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB30F
GR III | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | January 2013 | More recent by 70 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh GR III
WB30F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB30F
GR III | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III has physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the GR III against the WB30F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and WB30F is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and WB30F.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR III due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR III will render more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more modern GR III should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB30F |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $900 | $180 |