Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB350F, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR III was announced 4 years later than the WB350F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the GR III matches up versus the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB350F
GR III | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | January 2014 | More recent by 58 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GR III
WB350F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB350F
GR III | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GR III against the WB350F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB350F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and WB350F.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR III using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will render extra detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger GR III will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB350F |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $900 | $260 |