Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB35F, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR III was released 4 years after the WB35F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR III matches up against the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB35F
GR III | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | January 2014 | Newer by 58 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GR III
WB35F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB35F
GR III | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III offers outer measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the GR III compared to the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and WB35F.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR III because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR III will give more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The newer GR III is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $900 | $130 |