Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB50F (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR III was manufactured 4 years later than the WB50F and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR III scores against the WB50F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB50F
GR III | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | January 2014 | More recent by 58 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GR III
WB50F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB50F
GR III | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III comes with physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB50F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR III vs the WB50F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB50F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and WB50F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GR III will offer extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent GR III should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 207g (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $900 | $180 |