Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Released September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Updated by Ricoh GR III
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB50F (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GR III was manufactured 4 years later than the WB50F and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR III scores against the WB50F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB50F

 GR III WB50F 
RevealedSeptember 2018January 2014More recent by 58 months
Display resolution1037k460kClearer display (+577k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GR III

 WB50F GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB50F

 GR III WB50F 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III comes with physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB50F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR III vs the WB50F.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB50F is 90 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and WB50F.

To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GR III will offer extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent GR III should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography details
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography details
81
focusing manually
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
37
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
boasts touch focus
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
very good high ISO (102,400)
fixed screen
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR III
Sports photography with Samsung WB50F
76
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
40
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography details
Samsung WB50F Travel photography details
69
lighter than competition in class (257g)
boasts touch focus
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR III
Landscape photography with Samsung WB50F
69
focusing manually
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (102,400)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no Time Lapse function
47
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III Vlogging info
Samsung WB50F Vlogging info
37
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no mic port
30
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB50F
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung WB50F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR III Samsung WB50F
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2018-09-25 2014-01-07
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 102400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-16 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 6cm -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs -
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 257g (0.57 pounds) 207g (0.46 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP70A
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $900 $180