Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR III was introduced 5 years after the WB800F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GR III grades against the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB800F
GR III | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | January 2013 | More modern by 70 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR III
WB800F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB800F
GR III | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III offers external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR III against the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and WB800F.
Clearly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR III with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will render extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer GR III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $900 | $300 |