Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Following is a thorough review of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR III was introduced 5 years after the WB800F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GR III grades against the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB800F

 GR III WB800F 
ReleasedSeptember 2018January 2013More modern by 70 months
Display resolution1037k460kCrisper display (+577k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR III

 WB800F GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB800F

 GR III WB800F 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III offers external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR III against the WB800F.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and WB800F.

Clearly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR III with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will render extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer GR III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR III
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
81
you can focus manually
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
44
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR III
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
comes with focus by touch
lighter than average (257 grams)
very good high ISO (102,400)
fixed screen
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR III
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
76
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
can't change focal length (28mm)
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR III
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
69
lighter than average (257 grams)
comes with focus by touch
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competition (218g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
69
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (102,400)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no Timelapse mode
50
manual focus
reasonably wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III Vlogging details
Samsung WB800F Vlogging details
37
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (257g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no external microphone port
35
reasonably wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung WB800F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR III Samsung WB800F
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2018-09-25 2013-01-07
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 102400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-16 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 6cm -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash modes Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 257g (0.57 lb) 218g (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $900 $300