Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Successor is Sony a3500
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR III (24MP) and the A3000 (20MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR III was released 5 years later than the A3000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the GR III grades versus the A3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III & Sony Alpha A3000. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A3000
GR III | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | August 2013 | More recent by 62 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Ricoh GR III
A3000 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A3000
GR III | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III provides outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Sony A3000 has dimensions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the GR III and the A3000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and A3000 is 90 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The graphic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and A3000.
All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh GR III to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer GR III should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A3000 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A3000 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2013-08-27 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 lb) | 411 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1068 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $900 | $398 |