Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
68 Imaging
61 Features
76 Overall
67
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Push to 409600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 627g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Announced October 2015
- Old Model is Sony A7S
- Refreshed by Sony A7S III
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and A7S II (12MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and A7S II (Full frame) posses different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR III was launched 2 years after the A7S II which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A7S II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR III grades versus the A7S II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III & Sony Alpha A7S II. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony A7S II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A7S II
GR III | A7S II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | October 2015 | More modern by 36 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A7S II over the Ricoh GR III
A7S II | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Clearer display (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A7S II
GR III | A7S II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III features exterior dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sony A7S II has proportions of 127mm x 96mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") with a weight of 627 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the GR III against the A7S II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and A7S II is 90 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The picture below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and A7S II.
Plainly, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR III featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR III will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent GR III should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7S II Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A7S II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A7S II |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2015-10-12 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4240 x 2832 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 102400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 409600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 169 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focus range | 6cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p [60-100Mbps]), Full HD (1920 x 1080 @ 120p/60p/60i/30p/24p [50-100Mbps]), 720p (30p [16Mbps]) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lb) | 627 grams (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2993 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $900 | $2,767 |