Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65


57 Imaging
76 Features
92 Overall
82
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Sony A99

Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh GR III and Sony A99 II, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and A99 II (Full frame) have totally different sensor measurements.

The GR III was revealed 2 years after the A99 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the GR III matches up vs the A99 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Sony Alpha A99 II. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A99 II
GR III | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | Newer by 25 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Ricoh GR III
A99 II | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+192k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A99 II
GR III | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III offers external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Sony A99 II has proportions of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III and Sony A99 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GR III against the A99 II.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and A99 II is 90 and 57 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and A99 II.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR III having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A99 II will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 18MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger GR III will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 399 |
Cross type focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 lb) | 849g (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 490 shots |
Battery form | - | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | One | 2 |
Cost at launch | $900 | $3,198 |