Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Later Model is Sony A330
Photography Glossary Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Ricoh GR III and Sony A300, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and A300 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR III was introduced 10 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GR III grades vs the A300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A300
| GR III | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | January 2008 | More recent by 130 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh GR III
| A300 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A300
| GR III | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III provides outer dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR III and Sony A300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the GR III against the A300.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and A300 is 90 and 64 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and A300.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh GR III to provide more detail using its extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The newer GR III should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2008-01-30 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 6cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $900 | $0 |