Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Announced May 2009
- Earlier Model is Sony A300
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and A330 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR III was released 9 years later than the A330 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the GR III matches up against the A330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III & Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A330
GR III | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | May 2009 | More recent by 114 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Ricoh GR III
A330 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A330
GR III | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sony A330 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the GR III compared to the A330.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and A330 is 90 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The graphic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and A330.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh GR III to give more detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern GR III will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A330 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2009-05-18 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focus range | 6cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 lb) | 529 gr (1.17 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $900 | $545 |