Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f30/e3f308a0d9434d86db129d3a675997be5821abbe" alt="Ricoh GR III front Ricoh GR III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- Renewed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and A390 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The GR III was unveiled 8 years later than the A390 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the GR III grades vs the A390 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A390
GR III | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 100 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Ricoh GR III
A390 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A390
GR III | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III offers outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the GR III and the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92d18/92d18e0ecb8aa0921e34b915fa6d2e64a4bfadad" alt="Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 size comparison Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and A390 is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69021/6902187fb77af32eb2eee61e2c50d8c677d84103" alt="Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and A390.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh GR III to offer extra detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher GR III provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76894/7689498c1794fdc9ef30ec62cc28d832ef2857ea" alt="Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9a79/d9a7952d9478d71250177caf831fb80254b58b58" alt="Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A390 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 lb) | 549g (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $900 | $500 |