Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65


62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014

Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR III versus Sony H400, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR III (24MP) and the H400 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the GR III (APS-C) and H400 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

The GR III was introduced 4 years after the H400 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the GR III matches up vs the H400 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony H400
GR III | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | ![]() | February 2014 | Newer by 57 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Ricoh GR III
H400 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony H400
GR III | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III features physical dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR III versus Sony H400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the GR III and the H400.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and H400 is 90 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The picture underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and H400.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR III with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern GR III provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Sony H400 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 X 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 lb) | 628g (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $900 | $268 |