Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and H55 (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and H55 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe GR III was released 8 years after the H55 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GR III scores vs the H55 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony H55
GR III | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | June 2010 | More modern by 101 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Ricoh GR III
H55 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony H55
GR III | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III comes with exterior measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Sony H55 has specifications of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the GR III and the H55.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and H55 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and H55.
Clearly, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR III featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will render more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The newer GR III will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony H55 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 lbs) | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $900 | $235 |