Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100
90 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
92 Imaging
50 Features
44 Overall
47
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Announced September 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR III versus Sony QX100, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR III (24MP) and the QX100 (20MP) is very well matched but the GR III (APS-C) and QX100 (1") come with different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR III was unveiled 5 years after the QX100 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the GR III matches up versus the QX100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony QX100
| GR III | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 | September 2013 | Newer by 62 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 0k | Crisper display (+1037k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Ricoh GR III
| QX100 | GR III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony QX100
| GR III | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III comes with outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has measurements of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III versus Sony QX100 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR III and the QX100.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and QX100 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and QX100.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR III having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR III will resolve greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher GR III provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2013-09-05 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 102400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 6cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | None |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 257 gr (0.57 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $900 | $268 |