Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30
90 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
91 Imaging
44 Features
37 Overall
41
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Introduced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Lens-style by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR III (24MP) and the QX30 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the GR III (APS-C) and QX30 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe GR III was brought out 4 years later than the QX30 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the GR III grades vs the QX30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony QX30
| GR III | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | September 2014 | More recent by 50 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 0k | Crisper screen (+1037k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Ricoh GR III
| QX30 | GR III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony QX30
| GR III | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III has got exterior measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has measurements of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR III against the QX30.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and QX30 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and QX30.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR III due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will show more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger GR III provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Ricoh GR III vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 6cm | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $900 | $348 |