Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- Renewed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Ricoh GR III versus Sony RX10 IV, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR III (24MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is very well matched but the GR III (APS-C) and RX10 IV (1") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR III was revealed 13 months after the RX10 IV making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the GR III grades against the RX10 IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony RX10 IV
GR III | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | September 2017 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Ricoh GR III
RX10 IV | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 1037k | Crisper display (+403k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony RX10 IV
GR III | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III provides exterior dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR III versus Sony RX10 IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GR III against the RX10 IV.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and RX10 IV is 90 and 52 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and RX10 IV.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR III using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher GR III will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2017-09-12 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) | 1095 gr (2.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $900 | $1,698 |