Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Released August 2009
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Ricoh GR III versus Sony TX1, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TX1 (1/2.4") provide different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe GR III was unveiled 9 years after the TX1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the GR III grades against the TX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony TX1
GR III | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | August 2009 | More modern by 112 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh GR III
TX1 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX1
GR III | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR III versus Sony TX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the GR III versus the TX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and TX1 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and TX1.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give you more detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher GR III should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $900 | $350 |