Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
48
Overall
44

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Released September 2018
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR III
  • New Model is Ricoh GR III
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Released January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX200V, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR III was brought out 6 years later than the TX200V and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the GR III scores against the TX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony TX200V

 GR III TX200V 
ReleasedSeptember 2018January 2012Fresher by 81 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh GR III

 TX200V GR III 
Screen dimensions3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k1037kCrisper screen (+193k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX200V

 GR III TX200V 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III offers external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the GR III compared to the TX200V.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and TX200V is 90 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and TX200V.

To sum up, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR III because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR III will give you more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent GR III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR III
Portrait photography with Sony TX200V
81
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
36
decent megapixels (18MP)
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III Street photography info
Sony TX200V Street photography info
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
has touch to focus
lighter than average in class (257 grams)
above average ISO range (102,400)
screen does not articulate
68
has image stabilization (Optical)
features touch to focus
environment proof
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Sports photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Sports photography camera
76
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking focus
has phase detect AF
fixed focal length (28mm)
49
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography details
Sony TX200V Travel photography details
69
lighter than average in class (257 grams)
has touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
environment proof
features touch to focus
decent megapixels (18MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography advice
Sony TX200V Landscape photography advice
69
you can focus manually
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (102,400)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
47
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3.3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Vlogging camera
Sony TX200V as a Vlogging camera
37
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (257 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone socket
35
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Sony TX200V
 Ricoh GR IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Released 2018-09-25 2012-01-30
Body design Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 18MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 6000 x 4000 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 102400 12800
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-16 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance 6cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3.3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30s 2s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 257 gr (0.57 lbs) 129 gr (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BN
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $900 $500