Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- New Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX200V, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR III was brought out 6 years later than the TX200V and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the GR III scores against the TX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony TX200V
GR III | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | January 2012 | Fresher by 81 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh GR III
TX200V | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX200V
GR III | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III offers external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the GR III compared to the TX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and TX200V is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and TX200V.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR III because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR III will give you more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent GR III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 lbs) | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $900 | $500 |