Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
96 Imaging
45 Features
29 Overall
38
Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.4) lens
- 125g - 97 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2014
Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR III versus Sony W800, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR III (24MP) and the W800 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the GR III (APS-C) and W800 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR III was manufactured 4 years after the W800 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W800 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the GR III grades vs the W800 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony W800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony W800
GR III | W800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | February 2014 | More modern by 57 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W800 over the Ricoh GR III
W800 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony W800
GR III | W800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III offers external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sony W800 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III versus Sony W800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the GR III vs the W800.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and W800 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and W800.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher GR III provides an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony W800 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5152 x 3864 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.2-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVI MPEG4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 97 x 55 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $900 | $90 |