Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Renewed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
Photography Glossary Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR III versus Sony A35, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and A35 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR III was launched 7 years later than the A35 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the GR III scores versus the A35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III & Sony SLT-A35. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A35
| GR III | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 86 months |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 921k | Crisper display (+116k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Ricoh GR III
| A35 | GR III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A35
| GR III | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III provides external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony A35 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR III versus Sony A35 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the GR III vs the A35.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and A35 is 90 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and A35.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh GR III to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger GR III will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Ricoh GR III | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2011-09-20 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 6cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lb) | 415 grams (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $900 | $598 |