Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR III, both Large Sensor Compact cameras and they are both offered by Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and GR III (24MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR was brought out 6 years earlier than the GR III and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR scores versus the GR III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh GR III
| GR | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 1037k | Crisper display (+193k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Ricoh GR
| GR III | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 |  | April 2013 | Fresher by 66 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR III
| GR | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR has got external dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GR III has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the GR versus the GR III.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and GR III is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and GR III.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh GR III to provide you with extra detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older GR will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Ricoh GR III |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 257 grams (0.57 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $971 | $900 |