Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Announced April 2013
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR II
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

The following is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are built by Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GR was revealed 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the GR matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 GR GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
ReleasedApril 2013November 2009Newer by 42 months
Screen resolution1230k920kCrisper screen (+310k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh GR

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 GR GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR has external dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the GR against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The image below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh GR to render more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern GR is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
74
has manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
55
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low resolution (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography info
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than average in class (245g)
good ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
62
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Sports photography camera
45
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
32
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
doesn't have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
bad battery life (320 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
71
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
49
has built in flash
bad battery life (320 per charge)
low resolution (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Landscape photography camera
61
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
46
manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (320 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
30
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (245g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
does not have mic jack
20
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Ricoh GRRicoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Ricoh
Model Ricoh GR Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Class Large Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2013-04-17 2009-11-10
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4928 x 3264 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 50mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8 f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/3200s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/4000s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 gr (0.54 pounds) 453 gr (1.00 pounds)
Dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photos 320 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $971 $566