Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Later Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are built by Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR was revealed 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the GR matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | November 2009 | Newer by 42 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh GR
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR has external dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the GR against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The image below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh GR to render more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern GR is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Ricoh GR | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GR | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | 320 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $971 | $566 |