Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung HZ25W front
Portability
70
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Revealed April 2013
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
  • Introduced July 2010
  • Also referred to as WB5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W Overview

Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung HZ25W, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and HZ25W (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GR was brought out 2 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the GR matches up vs the HZ25W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung HZ25W

 GR HZ25W 
IntroducedApril 2013July 2010More modern by 34 months
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh GR

 HZ25W GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung HZ25W

 GR HZ25W 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh GR versus Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the GR against the HZ25W.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and HZ25W.

Clearly, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Ricoh GR will render more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The more modern GR provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Portrait photography camera
74
manual focus
high flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
34
focusing manually
supports RAW files
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography factors
Samsung HZ25W Street photography factors
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than others in class (245g)
good high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
55
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography details
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography details
45
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
34
long zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography information
Samsung HZ25W Travel photography information
71
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
does not feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
52
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
great zoom (624mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography details
Samsung HZ25W Landscape photography details
61
manual focus
good sized screen (3")
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
43
focusing manually
pretty wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging information
Samsung HZ25W Vlogging information
30
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
does not have mic jack
24
pretty wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung HZ25W
 Ricoh GRSamsung HZ25W
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Samsung HZ25W
Also Known as - WB5000
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-04-17 2010-07-06
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 26-624mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 300 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/4000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 gr (0.54 lb) 428 gr (0.94 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $971 $350