Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is WB600
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung HZ30W, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and HZ30W (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR was revealed 3 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ30W being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the GR grades versus the HZ30W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR & Samsung HZ30W. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung HZ30W
GR | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 40 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh GR
HZ30W | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung HZ30W
GR | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR comes with outer measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR versus Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR and the HZ30W.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and HZ30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and HZ30W.
Clearly, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR will offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent GR is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
Ricoh GR | Samsung HZ30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Samsung HZ30W |
Also Known as | - | WB600 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2010-01-19 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $971 | $280 |