Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Later Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Revealed September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh GR versus Samsung MV800, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR (16MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the GR (APS-C) and MV800 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR was brought out 20 months later than the MV800 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GR grades vs the MV800 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR & Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung MV800
| GR | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2013 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh GR
| MV800 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung MV800
| GR | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR enjoys exterior dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has specifications of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR versus Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the GR versus the MV800.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and MV800 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing specifications. The graphic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and MV800.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical megapixels but different sensor measurements. The GR provides the larger sensor which will make achieving bokeh simpler. The newer GR provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh GR vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Samsung MV800 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-04-17 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.20 m |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $971 | $499 |