Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GR versus Samsung SL202, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the GR (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR was released 4 years after the SL202 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the GR matches up against the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung SL202
GR | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 51 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GR
SL202 | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung SL202
GR | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR has got outer dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR versus Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the GR vs the SL202.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh GR will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger GR is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Samsung SL202 |
Also called | - | PL50 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-04-17 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 4.60 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $971 | $140 |