Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is IT100
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR and Samsung SL820, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and SL820 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR was released 4 years later than the SL820 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the GR grades versus the SL820 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR & Samsung SL820. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung SL820
| GR | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 51 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh GR
| SL820 | GR |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung SL820
| GR | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR comes with external measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR and Samsung SL820 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR against the SL820.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and SL820 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and SL820.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh GR will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent GR will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh GR vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Samsung SL820 |
| Also called | - | IT100 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 4.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $971 | $280 |