Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
20
Overall
30

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • New Model is Ricoh GR II
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released April 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh GR and Samsung ST93, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is very similar but the GR (APS-C) and ST93 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GR was revealed 2 years later than the ST93 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GR matches up versus the ST93 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung ST93

 GR ST93 
ReleasedApril 2013April 2011Fresher by 25 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Display resolution1230k460kCrisper display (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh GR

 ST93 GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung ST93

 GR ST93 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR has outer measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR and Samsung ST93 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the GR and the ST93.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and ST93 is 90 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and ST93.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The GR contains the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field easier. The fresher GR provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography information
Samsung ST93 Portrait photography information
74
has manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
29
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST93 as a Street photography camera
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (245g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
49
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST93 as a Sports photography camera
45
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
27
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography info
Samsung ST93 Travel photography info
71
lighter than competitors (245g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
70
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
great max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST93 Landscape photography highlights
61
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3")
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
38
great max aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging information
Samsung ST93 Vlogging information
30
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone socket
27
great max aperture (f)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung ST93
 Ricoh GRSamsung ST93
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Samsung ST93
Class Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2013-04-17 2011-04-20
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Full resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) ()
Maximal aperture f/2.8 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 300s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/4000s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 gr (0.54 lbs) 110 gr (0.24 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC -
Card slots One One
Retail cost $971 -