Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Announced April 2013
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GR and Samsung ST95, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is relatively similar but the GR (APS-C) and ST95 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR was announced 2 years later than the ST95 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the GR matches up against the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung ST95

 GR ST95 
AnnouncedApril 2013January 2011More recent by 28 months
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen resolution1230k460kSharper screen (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh GR

 ST95 GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung ST95

 GR ST95 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR offers outer dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR and Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR vs the ST95.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and ST95 is 90 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and ST95.

As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The GR has got the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The more recent GR will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Portrait photography camera
74
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
30
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography factors
Samsung ST95 Street photography factors
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (245g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
50
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
max ISO too low (0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography highlights
Samsung ST95 Sports photography highlights
45
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
27
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Travel photography camera
71
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
61
has manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
38
great maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
megapixel count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
does not have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging factors
Samsung ST95 Vlogging factors
30
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic socket
27
great maximum aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung ST95
 Ricoh GRSamsung ST95
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Samsung ST95
Type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2013-04-17 2011-01-19
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.8 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 300 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.40 m (at ISO 100) -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/4000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245g (0.54 pounds) -
Dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $971 $145