Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL350, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) and the GR (APS-C) and TL350 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR was manufactured 3 years after the TL350 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the GR matches up against the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR and Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung TL350
GR | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | February 2010 | Newer by 39 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh GR
TL350 | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL350
GR | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR has external dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL350 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the GR vs the TL350.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR and TL350 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and TL350.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR will give you greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer GR provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR | Samsung TL350 |
Also referred to as | - | WB2000 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 5.20 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lb) | 195 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $971 | $400 |