Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Later Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Launched January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh GR versus Samsung WB2200F, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly well matched but the GR (APS-C) and WB2200F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR was revealed 8 months earlier than the WB2200F so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the GR scores vs the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR & Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung WB2200F
| GR | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GR
| WB2200F | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | April 2013 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB2200F
| GR | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR offers outside measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the GR compared to the WB2200F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and WB2200F is 90 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and WB2200F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The GR comes with the larger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF simpler. The more aged GR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-04-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lb) | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $971 | $599 |