Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Revealed April 2013
  • Successor is Ricoh GR II
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB350F, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very similar but the GR (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR was manufactured 8 months before the WB350F so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR scores vs the WB350F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung WB350F

 GR WB350F 
Display resolution1230k460kSharper display (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GR

 WB350F GR 
IntroducedJanuary 2014April 2013Newer by 8 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB350F

 GR WB350F 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR has got exterior dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the GR and the WB350F.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and WB350F is 90 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and WB350F.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The GR comes with the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged GR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography advice
74
has manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
40
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Street photography camera
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average (245 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (276g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography advice
Samsung WB350F Sports photography advice
45
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
50
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
71
lighter than average (245g)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than others (276g)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography advice
62
has manual focus
nice screen size (3")
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
50
manual focus
reasonably wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
30
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (245 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
doesn't have external mic port
34
reasonably wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh GRSamsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Samsung WB350F
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-04-17 2014-01-07
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.9
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.40 m (at ISO 100) -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/4000s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245g (0.54 lbs) 276g (0.61 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $971 $260