Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Announced April 2013
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB35F, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty similar but the GR (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR was announced 8 months before the WB35F and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GR scores versus the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung WB35F

 GR WB35F 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GR

 WB35F GR 
RevealedJanuary 2014April 2013Fresher by 8 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB35F

 GR WB35F 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR has physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the GR and the WB35F.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The visual below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and WB35F.

All in all, both cameras have the same megapixel count albeit different sensor sizing. The GR has the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The older GR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography highlights
74
you can focus manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
37
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (245g)
good high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography advice
Samsung WB35F Sports photography advice
45
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow fps (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography features
Samsung WB35F Travel photography features
71
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than competition (194 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
62
you can focus manually
good sized screen (3 inches)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
43
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging factors
Samsung WB35F Vlogging factors
30
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (245g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of mic jack
31
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung WB35F
 Ricoh GRSamsung WB35F
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Samsung WB35F
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-04-17 2014-01-07
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/3.1-6.3
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 1,230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 300 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/4000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 gr (0.54 pounds) 194 gr (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 BP70A
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $971 $130