Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed September 2011
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GR versus Samsung WB750, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the GR (APS-C) and WB750 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR was manufactured 20 months later than the WB750 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GR scores versus the WB750 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung WB750
GR | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 20 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh GR
WB750 | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB750
GR | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR has got physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung WB750 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the GR versus the WB750.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR and WB750 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and WB750.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR will show extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern GR provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Samsung WB750 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR | Samsung WB750 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-04-17 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4096 x 3072 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash options | - | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $971 | $339 |