Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar but the GR (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR was brought out 4 months later than the WB800F so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the GR matches up vs the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung WB800F
| GR | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR
| WB800F | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB800F
| GR | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR features outer measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the GR versus the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and WB800F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The GR has got the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field easier.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-04-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 300 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $971 | $300 |