Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56
Ricoh GR front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR II
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2016
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Below is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh GR versus Sigma Quattro, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (APS-C).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GR was brought out 3 years prior to the Quattro and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GR grades vs the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sigma Quattro

 GR Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh GR

 Quattro GR 
RevealedFebruary 2016April 2013More recent by 34 months
Screen resolution1620k1230kClearer screen (+390k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sigma Quattro

 GR Quattro 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR comes with physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GR versus Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the GR vs the Quattro.

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR and Quattro is 90 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and Quattro.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Sigma Quattro to give extra detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older GR is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography info
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography info
74
you can focus manually
flash sync speed is above average (1/4,000s)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
81
focusing manually
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography information
Sigma Quattro Street photography information
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than average (625g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
45
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
70
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (3.8 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography info
Sigma Quattro Travel photography info
71
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
55
weather sealing
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (625g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
62
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
72
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging details
Sigma Quattro Vlogging details
30
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone socket
22
includes face detection focusing
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great ( pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than average (625g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Sigma Quattro
 Ricoh GRSigma sd Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sigma
Model Ricoh GR Sigma sd Quattro
Category Large Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2013-04-17 2016-02-23
Body design Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 29MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8 -
Number of lenses - 76
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/4000s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video file format MPEG-4 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245g (0.54 lb) 625g (1.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 BP-61
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $971 $738