Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Later Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh GR versus Sigma Quattro, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR was brought out 3 years prior to the Quattro and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GR grades vs the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR and Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sigma Quattro
GR | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh GR
Quattro | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | April 2013 | More recent by 34 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1230k | Clearer screen (+390k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sigma Quattro
GR | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR comes with physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR versus Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the GR vs the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR and Quattro is 90 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and Quattro.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Sigma Quattro to give extra detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older GR is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-04-17 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 625g (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $971 | $738 |