Ricoh GR vs Sony A9
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
![Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-GR/Ricoh-GR-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha A9 front Sony Alpha A9 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Alpha-A9/Sony-A9-front.jpg)
65 Imaging
73 Features
93 Overall
81
Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Replacement is Sony A9 II
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Ricoh GR vs Sony A9, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and A9 (24MP) and the GR (APS-C) and A9 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The GR was introduced 5 years before the A9 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the GR grades vs the A9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR and Sony Alpha A9. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony A9
GR | A9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Ricoh GR
A9 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2017 | ![]() | April 2013 | Newer by 48 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 1230k | Clearer screen (+210k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony A9
GR | A9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR provides exterior measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony A9 has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") along with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the GR and the A9.
![Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 size comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GR-vs-Sony-Alpha-A9-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR and A9 is 90 and 65 respectively.
![Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GR-vs-Sony-Alpha-A9-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and A9.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR having a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sony A9 will render extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 sensor size comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-GR-vs-Sony-Alpha-A9-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-GR-vs-Sony-Alpha-A9-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh GR vs Sony A9 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Alpha A9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Alpha A9 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-04-17 | 2017-04-19 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 673 grams (1.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 78 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | 3517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | 650 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 2 |
Price at launch | $971 | $4,498 |