Ricoh GR vs Sony A200
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh GR vs Sony A200, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and A200 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR was unveiled 4 years after the A200 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GR grades against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony A200
GR | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2013 | July 2008 | More modern by 58 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh GR
A200 | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony A200
GR | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR provides physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the GR against the A200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and A200.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh GR to offer you more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher GR should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2013-04-17 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 78 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $971 | $100 |