Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Introduced April 2013
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Launched July 2008
  • Successor is Sony A230
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh GR vs Sony A200, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and A200 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GR was unveiled 4 years after the A200 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GR grades against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony A200

 GR A200 
LaunchedApril 2013July 2008More modern by 58 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh GR

 A200 GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony A200

 GR A200 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR provides physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the GR against the A200.

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and A200.

To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh GR to offer you more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher GR should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
Sony A200 Portrait photography highlights
74
manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
53
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography highlights
Sony A200 Street photography highlights
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than average (245g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography advice
Sony A200 Sports photography advice
45
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography details
Sony A200 Travel photography details
71
lighter than average (245 grams)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
46
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography information
Sony A200 Landscape photography information
61
manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
53
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging details
Sony A200 Vlogging details
30
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (245 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone socket
9
no video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Sony A200
 Ricoh GRSony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Company Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Type Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2013-04-17 2008-07-17
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8 -
Available lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/4000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245 gr (0.54 pounds) 572 gr (1.26 pounds)
Dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 78 63
DXO Color Depth rating 23.6 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.5 11.3
DXO Low light rating 972 521
Other
Battery life 290 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $971 $100