Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
92 Imaging
50 Features
44 Overall
47
Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Announced September 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the QX100 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the GR (APS-C) and QX100 (1") feature different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR was unveiled 4 months before the QX100 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the GR scores against the QX100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony QX100
| GR | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+1230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Ricoh GR
| QX100 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony QX100
| GR | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 | September 2013 | Same age | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR has physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony QX100 has measurements of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the GR vs the QX100.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and QX100 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and QX100.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony QX100 will produce more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh GR vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2013-04-17 | 2013-09-05 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | - |
| Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photos | 200 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB65 | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $971 | $268 |