Ricoh GR vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- New Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Ricoh GR versus Sony T900, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR was launched 4 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GR grades vs the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony T900
GR | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | February 2009 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 922k | Sharper display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GR
T900 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony T900
GR | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR provides external measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR versus Sony T900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR vs the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GR and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and T900.
All in all, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GR will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher GR will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $971 | $300 |