Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Announced April 2013
  • New Model is Ricoh GR II
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Announced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Overview

Here is a in depth overview of the Ricoh GR versus Sony T900, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GR was launched 4 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GR grades vs the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony T900

 GR T900 
AnnouncedApril 2013February 2009Fresher by 51 months
Display resolution1230k922kSharper display (+308k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GR

 T900 GR 
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony T900

 GR T900 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR provides external measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR versus Sony T900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR vs the T900.

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GR and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and T900.

All in all, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GR will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher GR will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
Sony T900 Portrait photography highlights
74
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000s)
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
27
manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography advice
Sony T900 Street photography advice
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR
Sports photography with Sony T900
45
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography factors
Sony T900 Travel photography factors
71
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography factors
Sony T900 Landscape photography factors
61
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
36
manual focus
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging advice
Sony T900 Vlogging advice
30
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
no microphone socket
28
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Sony T900
 Ricoh GRSony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2013-04-17 2009-02-17
Body design Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8 f/3.5-10.0
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 1,230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 300s 2s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/4000s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245 gr (0.54 pounds) 143 gr (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $971 $300