Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
97 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Launched February 2012
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GR and Sony TX66, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the TX66 (18MP) is pretty similar but the GR (APS-C) and TX66 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR was unveiled 14 months later than the TX66 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX66 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the GR grades against the TX66 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony TX66
GR | TX66 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2013 | February 2012 | More recent by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Ricoh GR
TX66 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony TX66
GR | TX66 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 1230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR has got physical dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony TX66 has measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") along with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR and Sony TX66 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the GR and the TX66.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and TX66 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and TX66.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony TX66 will offer you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher GR should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX66 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 109 grams (0.24 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 250 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $971 | $350 |