Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220

Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56
Ricoh GR front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Announced April 2013
  • Successor is Ricoh GR II
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR and Sony W220, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and W220 (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and W220 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GR was introduced 4 years later than the W220 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GR scores versus the W220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony W220

 GR W220 
AnnouncedApril 2013January 2009More recent by 52 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Ricoh GR

 W220 GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony W220

 GR W220 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR has physical measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR and Sony W220 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the GR versus the W220.

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and W220 is 90 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and W220.

To sum up, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GR will resolve greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer GR will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR
Portrait photography with Sony W220
74
has manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
27
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR
Street photography with Sony W220
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (245g)
great ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography info
Sony W220 Sports photography info
45
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
25
image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography advice
Sony W220 Travel photography advice
71
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W220 as a Landscape photography camera
62
has manual focus
pretty good screen size (3")
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
32
has manual focus
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging information
Sony W220 Vlogging information
30
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (245g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
does not have external mic support
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Sony W220
 Ricoh GRSony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-04-17 2009-01-08
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 30-120mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-7.1
Macro focus range - 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 300 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options - Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/4000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245g (0.54 lbs) 147g (0.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $971 $160