Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320

Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56
Ricoh GR front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Ricoh GR vs Sony W320, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the GR (APS-C) and W320 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GR was launched 3 years later than the W320 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GR matches up vs the W320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony W320

 GR W320 
LaunchedApril 2013January 2010More recent by 40 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh GR

 W320 GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony W320

 GR W320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the GR vs the W320.

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and W320 is 90 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The visual below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and W320.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher GR is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography factors
Sony W320 Portrait photography factors
74
has manual focus
above average flash sync (1/4,000s)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
28
good resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography info
Sony W320 Street photography info
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
49
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography information
Sony W320 Sports photography information
45
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low frames per second (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
26
good resolution (14 megapixels)
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography highlights
Sony W320 Travel photography highlights
71
lighter than competitors (245g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
66
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Landscape photography info
Sony W320 Landscape photography info
62
has manual focus
screen size is good (3")
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
33
decently wide (26mm)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Vlogging info
Sony W320 Vlogging info
30
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone support
26
decently wide (26mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Sony W320
 Ricoh GRSony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Category Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2013-04-17 2010-01-07
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 4cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 300 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/4000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245g (0.54 pounds) 117g (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $971 $269