Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
46
Overall
41

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Sony WX70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 114g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 Overview

The following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WX70 (16MP) is relatively similar but the GR (APS-C) and WX70 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR was introduced 15 months after the WX70 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony WX70 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR grades vs the WX70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony WX70

 GR WX70 
LaunchedApril 2013January 2012Newer by 15 months
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen resolution1230k922kSharper screen (+308k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony WX70 over the Ricoh GR

 WX70 GR 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony WX70

 GR WX70 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR provides physical measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony WX70 has measurements of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the GR compared to the WX70.

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and WX70 is 90 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The picture below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and WX70.

Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The GR has got the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The younger GR will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography details
Sony WX70 Portrait photography details
74
focusing manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
34
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography information
Sony WX70 Street photography information
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (245g)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
68
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus by touch
lighter than competition (114g)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Sports photography camera
Sony WX70 as a Sports photography camera
45
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography highlights
Sony WX70 Travel photography highlights
71
lighter than competition (245g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
lighter than competition (114 grams)
comes with focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Landscape photography camera
Sony WX70 as a Landscape photography camera
61
focusing manually
nice screen size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
43
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Vlogging camera
Sony WX70 as a Vlogging camera
30
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (245g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
does not have mic support
36
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (114 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR vs Sony WX70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Sony WX70
 Ricoh GRSony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-04-17 2012-01-30
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8 f/2.6-6.3
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT LCD XtraFine TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 5.30 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/4000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245g (0.54 lb) 114g (0.25 lb)
Dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photographs 240 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB65 NP-BN
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $971 $242